xscanTender inspection bureau

Every tender, filed in triplicate

One copy goes to the prosecutor, one to the defense, and the original stays with the court. Every quote they use is checked against the notice.

  • Original: the court
  • Canary copy: the prosecution
  • Pink copy: the defense

… real tenders on file, from official APIs and the websites people add.

Form XS-3 · Original—
Buyer—
SubjectWaiting for the first ruling
Exhibit—
Not in notice—
Ruling—
RiskAwaiting the court

Three copies. One record.

Each party works on its own copy, with one job and one rule it cannot break. They file in this order, every time.

  1. Form XS-3Copy 2

    The prosecutor

    Finds conditions that fit only one supplier.

    RuleMust quote the notice word for word for every count.

  2. Form XS-3Copy 3

    The defense

    Answers each count for the buyer.

    RuleGives the most honest good reason, and concedes when there is none.

  3. Form XS-3Original

    The court

    Weighs both copies and rules count by count.

    RuleGives no weight to a quote that is not really in the notice.

Watch them argue a real tender

Cheap first. The court only when it matters.

Free rules screen every tender. Only the ones with warning signs are worth an AI hearing.

Latest rulings

Real tenders, real rulings. Open any one to read the full argument.

  • TED…EU, official API
  • USAspending…US, official API
  • SAM.gov…US, by link
  • zakup.gov.kz…Kazakhstan, public API
  • Other websites…by link, read by AI
How sources are read

Open a case.

Paste a link from any procurement site, or pick one the screening already flagged.

See what to check

xscan points out warning signs for a person to review. It never says anyone is guilty.